click to show more information

click to hide/show information About your Search

20121222
20121230
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3
for not only law enforcement and military, but civilians. we put people in a scenario where they are being attacked and asoughted. we've watched that behaviors. those that don't have a standoff alternative succumb to the violence of the bad guy. those that have a standoff alternative are often able to not only save their lives, but to mitigate risk and save the lives of those people also being assaulted. >>> attorney general, let me ask when you talk about the training program, is this something that piques user interest? also, i want to find out why you support wanting to do this in certainly schools, do you also support getting assault weapons off our streets, the ban that may have federal support coming in the new year? >> well, i've taken some training from our investigators who are sworn police officers and who would do training, including a simulator, which is very helpful. the simulate situations that people might encounter, and you have a plastic gun that records on the computer how you reacted and you get to refine your reactions, so i think that intensive training can train so th
shootings, a familiar american policy-making consensus called for federal gun-control laws. more precisely, they want congress to pass the ban on big, dramatic-looking assault-type weapons that existed from 1994 until the law sun-setted in 2004. government, for the past 80 years, or so, has seen its purpose as mainly to respond to society's failures the moment they occur or whenever they are imagined. adam lanza killed with guns so modern, policy-making logic posits that government must pass a law. whether that law will accomplish its goal is irrelevant. policy-making has become an activity that supports the genetic and financial needs of policymakers and their follower tribes. the community's role, we've lately learned, is to provide revenue. where are we going with that? >> i think he started off in a legitimate direction where he talked about how much of the legislation is done with deadlines and during lame-duck sessions. we're responsive as opposed to getting proactive. i get where he's coming from with respect to failures with the assault weapons ban in 1994. if you had a ban prior t
. arizona's attorney general proposing to change the state law that would allow an educator in each school to carry a gun. the "l.a. times," the city of los angeles collected more than -- this story is unbelievable. they collected more than 2,000 firearms part of a guns for groceries buyback program. 75 assault weapons were included in that and two rocket launchers were turned in for cash. >> they got steak and shrimp for the rocket launchers. what about teachers with guns in classrooms? >> i mean, it's amazing to me. i had randy wine gart ten of the american federation of teachers on my show last night. it's outrageous to me on two levels. one, you're going to put more guns into schools it to try to deal with getting guns out of the school. you don't have money for students. you don't have money for sports and arts. you don't have money for anything you need in school, but you're going to find money to buy guns, bullets and training for teachers? where did the conservatives come up with this money from? how, if you had an armed teacher, would that have solved newtown? it would have made t
Search Results 0 to 2 of about 3